Comments on: A processThis Recap http://www.geekaboo.net/blog/2004/04/26/a-processthis-recap/ Search my thoughts and know me Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:02:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: Jim Webber http://www.geekaboo.net/blog/2004/04/26/a-processthis-recap/#comment-2 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://www.geekaboo.net/blog/2004/04/26/a-processthis-recap/#comment-2 Right on mate! Now you're telling it like it is, or at least how it should be :-) And a wonderful choice of book to order too! Jim Right on mate!

Now you’re telling it like it is, or at least how it should be :-)

And a wonderful choice of book to order too!

Jim

]]> by: Mark Baker http://www.geekaboo.net/blog/2004/04/26/a-processthis-recap/#comment-3 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://www.geekaboo.net/blog/2004/04/26/a-processthis-recap/#comment-3 My response; <a href="http://www.markbaker.ca/2002/09/Blog/2004/05/02#2004-05-garland-processthis">http://www.markbaker.ca/2002/09/Blog/2004/05/02#2004-05-garland-processthis</a> My response;

http://www.markbaker.ca/2002/09/Blog/2004/05/02#2004-05-garland-processthis

]]> by: Matt Garland http://www.geekaboo.net/blog/2004/04/26/a-processthis-recap/#comment-4 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://www.geekaboo.net/blog/2004/04/26/a-processthis-recap/#comment-4 Mark, Insightful as always; thanks for your contribution! I'm guessing that the Web Services folks are saying "processThis" while imagining that both the input *and output* messages are defined in WSDL. If I strike the sentence that equates processThis to POST, I think the recap becomes self-consistent and represents what Jim and Savas are getting at. Re-read it in that light and see if you agree. Significantly, what you seem to have hit upon is that the semantics of processThis may *not* be the same as those of POST. Mark,

Insightful as always; thanks for your contribution!

I’m guessing that the Web Services folks are saying “processThis” while imagining that both the input and output messages are defined in WSDL. If I strike the sentence that equates processThis to POST, I think the recap becomes self-consistent and represents what Jim and Savas are getting at. Re-read it in that light and see if you agree.

Significantly, what you seem to have hit upon is that the semantics of processThis may not be the same as those of POST.

]]>